This may seem like a random rant but in the past week I've been asked numerous times who my guardian was. I am 32 years old. What. The. Hell.
Every time I am asked who to put as an emergency contact the medical staff then assume that person is my guardian! Why? Is there something that they know about my diagnosis that I don't? Or are they passing judgement on me based on overt physical symptoms? I am still incredibly articulate, intelligent and knowledgeable about my medical care. I'm disabled not mentally incompetent.
This came up again the other day when applying for in-home services. A woman called twice in an hour leaving messages to call her back about my application. Obviously it was not a convenient time for me! She then called a little while later and left a message that if I did not call her back within the hour that she would call my mother and if she could not be reached then she would assume that I was not interested in receiving services. Oh really?? That sounded an awful lot like a threat. I called her back but emphasized that she was to never call my mother unless it was an EMERGENCY since that was what EMERGENCY CONTACT means, damn it! Also, if I had gone through a lengthy application process then OF COURSE I needed the services. Talk about lacking understanding.
So my question is this, "Do others receive this kind of condescending treatment? If so, how do you respond?"
If not for the Holocaust the Germans may have suceeded.
More accurately said, the gods hands would have been tied and the positive goals of the Third Reich would have dictated triumph.
The Holocaust ensured we were delivered into this sick age of societal decay.
Posted by: This is how they planned and executed this Situation. It's exactly what they wanted | March 29, 2011 at 01:59 PM
As people begin to age the gods employ corrupting tactics. They ultimately begin to look down on the children and the wisdom they recently understood:::
They voluntarily turn their back on their opportunity to ascend and instead embrace evil.
It's not old people who go to heaven. Old people must come back because of the mistakes they've made throughout their lives. Children are the ones who have the opportunity to ascend.
Children are discounted by adults in society. The gods corrupt people as they age, use trust-building tactics and soon adults view the children as ignorant, yet to understand the god's system, and subsequently look down on the children. This is one of the most bitter, painful ironies the gods employ, for people consciously turn their back on and lose their opportunity to ascend::::
Religions teach that old people to go to heaven when they die. They don't. Old people are reincarnated. It's the children who go to heaven, those who have a chance at immortality.
The wisdom the gods impart to children, either through their innocence/purity or religious-based educational pursuits are the gods sharing the truth with their most favored people::::It's the children whom the gods teach the right way for it is the children who have a chance. For example, they teach children to have faith, for understanding the god's geographical clues hurts people by illustrating negative things, opening the door for the god's to employ deceptive tactics.
Old people don't go to heaven. Old people must come back because of the mistakes they've made throughout their lives. It's the children who have the opportunity to go to "heaven". They must behave apprioriately, think correctly and be genuinely god-fearing. Their innocence and lack of desensitization ensures they have a real opportunity to achieve this goal.
This is charecteristic of the gods methodology::::The big prize gone early, deception compels people to chase something that has already been decided. They sent this clue with boss as well. It is also a clue supporting my claim RW&B's german is in fact Christianity's Anti-Christ. Logic also dictates, considering the definition.
The confusion over this multi-dimentional positioning will serve as an effective tactic, eliminating many additional disfavored in the process, for positioning states the Apocalypse to be a continuation of WorldWarII's Aryan superrace ideals, positioned as punishment for the 5th century invastion of the Roman Empire:::John's Fourth Reich.
This amounts only to "nested theater":::::Levels of positioning enables the gods to scapegoat:::::RW&B merely is the tool the gods chose to execute the final scene of their scripted theater that is human history.
Just as they would have had me chase boss so would they have wanted me to sign on to this theater, evil by definition, and chase this role of Anti-Christ. By doing so I would have incurred evil and would have been punished, painfully "losing" Anti-Christ in the process.
Does that mean RW&B is not the Anti-Christ?? I suspect as they would have "offered" it to me so will there be a fake Anti-Christ for those in these generations to accept as well. But it is a clone host. This is ALL clone host theater, created not as a clue to me but instead designed to be preditory on the disfavored, designed to increase indecency and further the god's goal of justification towards The End.
We were all merely peasants centuries ago, struggling with our disfavor, but without the enormity of temptations, real and telepathic, which exist today.
They have shared I was positioned to some disfavored as the Second Coming of Christ, explaining all the evil surrounding me and RW&B's placement in the "eye of The Beast" was to positon the sabotage of my candidacy (Damien Omen, Big Army Men, etc).
The Big Lie of course is that Christianity is evil. The reverse positioning nature of Planet Earth dictates that good is demonized, as we wintessed in World War II, while evil is put on a pedistal, as we see with the Italians.
The truth? The gods used their tools to create this and the rest of the incidents surrounding this Situation to distract the people from my message, for I speak the truth:::Only you can save you. You have to be responsible for your own relationship with the gods.
The gods are asexual. They have no sex organs nor rectums.
When the gods take children these individuals have the opportunity to become "god-like". Temptations are employed and, if sucessful, these are the individuals who make up the human race's immortals.
I believe there are opportunities that exist for females that do no exist for males. I don't mean to paint with a broad brush but women's "sexual peak" may represent the transistion to "sociological males" and their "fall from grace". Considering today's promiscuity I question whether this is currently applicable, and is yet anther 20th century-earlier phenominah.
I believe Purgatory is real. I think it is a temporary destination, perhaps sparsely utilized until the Apocalypse, but this will be the destination for those who "ascend" during the event. As they've said this planet will too be disposed of one day and it is imperative people try to avoid that destination, for there may be no escaping its fate.
Posted by: As people begin to age the gods employ corrupting tactics. They ultimately begin to look down on th | May 03, 2008 at 08:48 PM
When some dimwit patronizes me, I usually suggest that they engage in sexual intercourse with themself. Or I scrunch my face up and announce that I just made a boo-boo in my pants. These responses fluster them though they try to act nonchalant, which amuses me.
Posted by: Paco Steinway | November 25, 2006 at 05:02 AM
It's amazing. I think partly it's what I've myself noticed, that people would much rather talk to a relative/carer/man who cleans your windows than yourself. This is why the only person they ever get as my contact is my solicitor (that fazes em!). If there's anything needs telling, they are going to have to deal with ME.
Second, I think it's just not thinking before opening the mouth. A few years ago a British woman got murdered in Thailand. She was a seasoned backpacker, and over thirty. The reporter interviewing the parents evidently was pre-programmed to the word "daughter", so he asked them why they had "let" her go abroad on her own, and was completely flummoxed when they asked him in turn how they were supposed to give orders to an independent adult.
Same with illness/disability/old age. It is assumed that you are no longer a fully-functioning adult even if you are not hooked up to a repsirator.
Posted by: charlesdawson | November 25, 2006 at 03:41 AM
You do know that there is the perfect response don't you Mumpy? However it is likely to get you struck off the list ;-)
Posted by: marmiteboy | November 24, 2006 at 07:58 AM
The roomate "takes care" of a few minimalist things I can't do, (shoe tying, occasional shower help) but the rest is all on me. I think my family is terrified that as I age, they *will* have to help with my care and they most emphatically see that as my responsibility
Posted by: imfunnytoo | November 23, 2006 at 01:49 PM
My son's 11, so I do still take care of him. ;) But the bewildering, condescending question we get most often is "Does he go to school?" Uh...yeah...he's 11, that's what 11-year-olds do around here. We haven't made him drop out to work in the coalmines yet.
Posted by: Penny | November 23, 2006 at 12:28 PM
Oh, yeah, I still get that. I hate it, and I hate the expectation that my mother takes care of me (she doesn't much; I'm in college). I have no desire to get her help with filling out mental health and sexual health screenings in thepacked waiting room.
Posted by: Nickie | November 23, 2006 at 12:08 PM
In home services - we had similar experiences! Love the outfit! Happy Thanksgiving
Posted by: mcewen | November 23, 2006 at 10:18 AM